Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niehaus, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

African Affairs 101:557-583 (2002)
© 2002 The Royal African Society


Article

Ethnicity and the boundaries of belonging: reconfiguring Shangaan identity in the South African lowveld

Isak Niehaus

Isak Niehaus teaches anthropology at the University of Pretoria in South Africa.

During the 1980s, revisionist studies of ethnicity in southern Africa emphasized how colonial regimes constructed ethnic groups for their own purposes, such as for divide and rule tactics. Drawing on more recent theories on ethnicity, this article re-examines Shangaan identity in the multi-ethnic South African lowveld. It highlights the agency of the subordinate to adopt terms of their own definition as the basis for collective assertion, and also the multivocality of ethnic constructs. It suggests that through time different models of Shangaan ethnicity have emerged. Between 1864 and 1936, the leaders of Shangaan refugees from Portuguese East Africa (now Mozambique) entered into formal political alliances with autochthonous Basotho headmen and chiefs. But with the demarcation of Native Reserves and Bantustans during the era of apartheid, Shangaan leaders have deployed a segregationist ‘tribal paradigm’ to mobilize a constituency for struggles over land. By contrast, non-royalists have embraced an assimilationist model of Shangaan ethnicity to facilitate their incorporation into the social landscape of the lowveld. Such incorporation is evident in their attendance at Basotho initiation lodges, in the high incidence of inter-ethnic marriages, and in the eminence of Shangaan ritual specialists. This assimilationist paradigm was brought to the fore in the struggles against apartheid, and in the dramatic display of Shangaan and Basotho regional unity during the Bushbuckridge border dispute of 1996.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.