Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abrahamsen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

African Affairs 102:189-210 (2003)
© 2003 The Royal African Society

Article

African studies and the postcolonial challenge

Rita Abrahamsen

Rita Abrahamsen is lecturer in African and Postcolonial Politics in the Department of International Politics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth.

Postcolonial theory is frequently dismissed as too theoretical and esoteric, and hence irrelevant to the study of contemporary African politics and society. This article challenges this dismissal of postcolonialism, and argues for a more constructive dialogue between African studies and postcolonial approaches. Recognizing that postcolonialism cannot be regarded as a uniform body of theory, or a school of thought in the conventional academic sense, the article focuses on certain key themes and problematizations of relevance to contemporary Africa. In particular, it elaborates on postcolonialism's conceptualization of power, and argues that the recognition of the relationship between power, discourse and political institutions and practices has much to contribute to the study of African politics. These insights are further investigated through a discussion of development, hybridity and resistance. The article concludes that both African studies and postcolonial approaches stand to benefit from a more constructive engagement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anthropological TheoryHome page
T. Sanders
Buses in Bongoland: Seductive analytics and the occult
Anthropological Theory, June 1, 2008; 8(2): 107 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EthnicitiesHome page
H. Hintjens
Post-genocide identity politics in Rwanda
Ethnicities, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 5 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
M. Gandy
Planning, Anti-planning and the Infrastructure Crisis Facing Metropolitan Lagos
Urban Stud, February 1, 2006; 43(2): 371 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
S. A. Radcliffe
Development and geography: towards a postcolonial development geography?
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2005; 29(3): 291 - 298.
[PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.