Skip Navigation

African Affairs 2004 103(413):615-633; doi:10.1093/afraf/adh048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ponte, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Royal African Society 2004, all rights reserved

Article

The politics of ownership: Tanzanian coffee policy in the age of liberal reformism

Stefano Ponte

Stefano Ponte is a Senior Researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen

Abstract

In the last two decades, the twin processes of liberalization and privatization have facilitated the ‘capturing’ of key markets and assets by foreign interests in many African countries. This is being increasingly perceived in domestic constituencies as a loss of national ownership and has prompted attempts by the state to defend the interests of ‘local’ firms and businesspeople. These actions have often been portrayed in the literature as manoeuvres that — in the guise of nationalism — are ultimately characterized by clientelistic and rent-seeking objectives. The analysis of coffee politics and policy in Tanzania carried out in this article challenges this interpretation. It shows that practices affecting the perceived (il)legitimacy of ‘foreign’ ownership of assets and control of markets constitute elements of a ‘politics of ownership’. This politics, although often sporting antiliberal features, does not question the essential nature of market reforms. Rather, it seeks to undermine the domination of ‘foreign’ interests in key industries through the redefinition of the parameters of competition to the advantage of local actors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.