Skip Navigation

African Affairs 2005 104(415):181-205; doi:10.1093/afraf/adi035
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Waal, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. All rights reserved

Article

Who are the Darfurians? Arab and African identities, violence and external engagement

Alex de Waal

Alex de Waal is Fellow, Global Equity Initiative, Harvard University, Programme Director, Social Science Research Council and Director, Justice Africa

Abstract

This article examines processes of identity formation in Darfur, now part of the Republic of Sudan, over the last four centuries. The basic story is of four overlapping processes of identity formation, each of them primarily associated with a different period in the region's history: namely, the ‘Sudanic identities’ associated with the Dar Fur sultanate, Islamic identities, the administrative tribalism associated with the twentieth-century Sudanese state, and the recent polarization of ‘Arab’ and ‘African’ identities, associated with new forms of external intrusion and internal violence. It is a story that emphasizes the much-neglected east-west axis of Sudanese identity, arguably as important as the north-south axis, and redeems the neglect of Darfur as a separate and important locus for state formation in northern Sudan, paralleling and competing with the Nile Valley states. It focuses on the incapacity of both the modern Sudanese state and international actors to comprehend the singularities of Darfur, accusing much Sudanese historiography of ‘Nilocentrism’, namely, the use of analytical terms derived from the experience of the Nile Valley to apply to Darfur.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Security DialogueHome page
C. G. Badescu and L. Bergholm
The Responsibility To Protect and the Conflict in Darfur: The Big Let-Down
Security Dialogue, June 1, 2009; 40(3): 287 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EthnicitiesHome page
E. Solevad Nielsen
Ethnic boundaries and conflict in Darfur: An event structure hypothesis
Ethnicities, December 1, 2008; 8(4): 427 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Social ArchaeologyHome page
S. MacEachern
Where in Africa does Africa start?: Identity, genetics and African studies from the Sahara to Darfur
Journal of Social Archaeology, October 1, 2007; 7(3): 393 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Afr Aff (Lond)Home page
N. Grono
Briefing -- Darfur: The international community's failure to protect
Afr. Aff. (Lond), October 1, 2006; 105(421): 621 - 631.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Afr Aff (Lond)Home page
S. Massey and R. May
Commentary: The crisis in Chad
Afr. Aff. (Lond), July 1, 2006; 105(420): 443 - 449.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.