Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BROOKES, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

African Affairs 43:171-177 (1944)
© The Royal African Society

African Mental Ability

SENATOR EDGAR BROOKES

No question is more vital to the future of Africa than the mental capacity of its original inhabitants, whose two main groupings are the Negro and the Bantu-speaking peoples. Nor is any question less exactly known. It was therefore with surprise that many people learned earlier this year that Colonel Deneys Reitz had made the following statement in a war review at the Guildhall in London: "I am not an anthropologist and therefore not qualified to say whether our native tribes will ever be capable of evolving up to European standards. Indeed the balance of scientific evidence appears to lean to the contrary opinion." The Union High Commissioner in London speaks with the authority of a former South African Minister of Native Affairs. Nevertheless this statement has not gone without challenge. The following article was written at our request by the Principal of the Adams Native College in Natal, who also represents the Natives of Natal and Zululand in the South African Senate. But the subject is of such importance and such complexity that we have added an extended summary of a book by Dr. S. Bieshcuvel, a psychologist now working with the R.A.F., on "African Intelligence".Dr. Bieshcuvel‘s work, which has been delayed by the war, is a reply to some of the "scientific evidence" cited by Colonel Reitz. Although in his article Dr. Brookes mentions other work (by Dr. van Rensburg) more recent than Dr. Fick’s, the summary may give some idea of the complexity of the work of investigation required before it acquires a true scientific validity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.