Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruteere, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pommerolle, M.-E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

African Affairs 102:587-604 (2003)
© 2003 The Royal African Society

Article

Democratizing Security or Decentralizing Repression? The ambiguities of community policing in Kenya

Mutuma Ruteere and Marie-Emmanuelle Pommerolle

Mutuma Ruteere is a PhD student in political science, University of Nebraska-Lincon, USA, former Head of Research, Kenya Human Rights Commission, email: mruteere{at}bigred.unl.edu.
Marie-Emmanuelle Pommerolle is a PhD student in political science, Centre d'études de l'Afrique Noire, Bordeaux, France. email: mepommerolle{at}free.fr.

Crime, and the means to control it, are major preoccupations for the citizens of Nairobi. Traditional policing methods have failed to curb a rising tide of criminality, with members of the police being criticized for corruption, complicity with criminals, and resort to extra-judicial killings. With a view to improving this situation, Kenyans are experimenting with community policing strategies, pioneered in the United States, the United Kingdom and South Africa. This article provides a brief background to the emergence of community policing in these countries, dissecting the ambiguities in its conceptualization. It then introduces the context of crime and policing in Kenya, before providing a detailed examination of two community policing projects supported by different civil society organizations in Nairobi. The aim of the article is to show that ambiguity in the concept of community policing means that in practice it may operate to reinforce undemocratic and oppressive structures in Kenyan society. The authors conclude by advocating a more radical transformation of the political culture in which policing initiatives are set.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Urban StudHome page
J. Post and S. Mwangi
Constraints on Neighbourhood Activism: Experiences with Services Upgrading in Nakuru, Kenya
Urban Stud, March 1, 2009; 46(3): 665 - 686.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J CriminolHome page
J. R. Topping
Diversifying from within: Community Policing and the Governance of Security in Northern Ireland
Br. J. Criminol., November 1, 2008; 48(6): 778 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
C. Benit-Gbaffou, S. Didier, and M. Morange
Communities, the Private Sector, and the State: Contested Forms of Security Governance in Cape Town and Johannesburg
Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2008; 43(5): 691 - 717.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Afr Aff (Lond)Home page
S. Heald
State, law, and vigilantism in northern Tanzania
Afr. Aff. (Lond), April 1, 2006; 105(419): 265 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.