Skip Navigation



African Affairs Advance Access published online on December 5, 2005
African Affairs, doi:10.1093/afraf/adi090
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/418/1    most recent
adi090v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pegg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. All rights reserved

Article

Can Policy Intervention Beat The Resource Curse? Evidence from the Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project

Scott Pegg 1 *

1 Department of Political Science at Indiana University/Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Scott Pegg, E-mail: smpegg{at}iupui.edu


  Abstract

Countries that are heavily dependent on natural resource exports have performed poorly on various measures of economic, social, and political development -- a phenomenon usually described as ‘the resource curse’. In spite of this, many Western policymakers believe that natural resources will ultimately provide Africa’s road to development. The World Bank argues that the resource curse is not inevitable and that good governance and sound economic policies are intervening variables that can mitigate its ill effects. This article critically evaluates the Chad-Cameroon pipeline project in order to assess whether or not policy interventions can ameliorate the resource curse. The largest single private sector investment in sub-Saharan Africa, the Chad-Cameroon pipeline project has also featured unprecedented World Bank policy interventions designed to address the complex environmental, social, and budgetary implications of large-scale oil production. The pipeline project is the World Bank’s most significant attempt yet to modify the intervening variable of government policy and transform the equation from one of resource extraction + bad governance -> poverty exacerbation to one of resource extraction + good governance -> poverty reduction. This article finds that these policy interventions are not working well and that the Chad-Cameroon pipeline project is unlikely to lead to poverty alleviation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Afr Aff (Lond)Home page
S. Massey and R. May
Commentary: The crisis in Chad
Afr. Aff. (Lond), July 1, 2006; 105(420): 443 - 449.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.