Skip Navigation

The relativity of poverty and income: How reliable are African economic statistics?

  1. Morten Jerven*
  1. *Morten Jerven (Mjerven{at}sfu.ca) is Assistant Professor at the School for International Studies at Simon Fraser University, Vancouver.

Abstract

It has been argued that the fundamental cause of Africa’s current relative poverty is a lack of pro-growth institutions deriving either from the colonial system, the period of slavery, or from particular geographic or population characteristics. This article takes a fresh look at estimates of African country incomes. It subjects the available datasets to tests of accuracy, reliability, and volatility, and finds that there is very little to explain in terms of diversity of income between countries. With the exception of some resource-rich enclaves, a few island states, and South Africa, the income of one African economy is not meaningfully different from another. It is found that the majority of African countries should for all practical purposes be considered to have the same income level. The article therefore concludes that it is futile to use GDP estimates to prove a link between income today and existence of pro-growth institutions in the past, and recommends a searching reconsideration of the almost exclusive use of GDP as a measure of relative development.

This Article

  1. Afr Aff (Lond) doi: 10.1093/afraf/adp064
  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. adp064v1
    2. 109/434/77 most recent

Classifications

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Share

  1. Email this article

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.